Template:Infobox: Revision history

7 August 2006

• curprev 05:3005:30, 7 August 2006‎ >16@r‎ m 1,141 bytes +23‎ +fr

18 June 2006

• curprev 12:0612:06, 18 June 2006‎ >Circeus‎ 1,118 bytes −11‎ sortkey

13 June 2006

• curprev 08:0708:07, 13 June 2006‎ >Daviddecraene‎ 1,129 bytes +2‎ sorry, accidently changed
• curprev 08:0608:06, 13 June 2006‎ >Daviddecraene‎ 1,127 bytes −1‎ →‎Usage

10 May 2006

• curprev 17:5417:54, 10 May 2006‎ >CBDunkerson‎ 1,128 bytes −37‎ Unprotecting - Based on discussion this page should be used to demonstrate currently common infobox template techniques of all kinds.
• curprev 17:5317:53, 10 May 2006‎ >CBDunkerson‎ m 1,165 bytes 0‎ Unprotected Template:Infobox: Unprotecting since consensus seems to be established

21 April 2006

• curprev 15:0915:09, 21 April 2006‎ >CBDunkerson‎ 1,165 bytes +23‎ Adding 'noinclude' tags since some pages are actually transcluding this one.
• curprev 15:0715:07, 21 April 2006‎ >CBDunkerson‎ 1,142 bytes +14‎ Adding protection template. See Talk page.
• curprev 15:0615:06, 21 April 2006‎ >CBDunkerson‎ m 1,128 bytes 0‎ Protected Template:Infobox: Contents of page still disputed. Restoring protection and instituting straw poll. [edit=sysop:move=sysop]
• curprev 14:2814:28, 21 April 2006‎ >Netoholic‎ 1,128 bytes −419‎ rmv conditionals. this is a _basic_ template for new template editors. Conditionals are not _basic_ tools.
• curprev 03:5003:50, 21 April 2006‎ >Marknew‎ 1,547 bytes +610‎ Restored Usage instructions (none available on the talk page)

19 April 2006

• curprev 12:1212:12, 19 April 2006‎ >Marknew‎ m 937 bytes −27‎ attempt number 2...
• curprev 12:1112:11, 19 April 2006‎ >Marknew‎ 964 bytes −10‎ Replace data5 "hack" with something clearer that *appears* to work in the same way.
• curprev 10:0910:09, 19 April 2006‎ >The editor1‎ 974 bytes 0‎ No edit summary
• curprev 10:0810:08, 19 April 2006‎ >The editor1‎ 974 bytes −27‎ No edit summary
• curprev 09:5909:59, 19 April 2006‎ >The editor1‎ 1,001 bytes +81‎ No edit summary

18 April 2006

• curprev 22:4322:43, 18 April 2006‎ >Freakofnurture‎ 920 bytes −662‎ cleanup, convert qif to #if:
• curprev 18:0018:00, 18 April 2006‎ >CBDunkerson‎ 1,582 bytes −36‎ Removed protection - assume #if: has resolved the dispute
• curprev 17:5917:59, 18 April 2006‎ >CBDunkerson‎ m 1,618 bytes 0‎ Unprotected Template:Infobox: Unprotecting - hopefully #if: has resolved the dispute by superceding both methods

19 February 2006

• curprev 03:2803:28, 19 February 2006‎ >Jtkiefer‎ 1,618 bytes +36‎ protected
• curprev 03:1803:18, 19 February 2006‎ >Locke Cole‎ 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - part of that compromise was placing a link to it from here, which you and Trodel rejected
• curprev 03:0903:09, 19 February 2006‎ >Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ rvt per compromise, which create Template:Infobox Conditionals
• curprev 02:2002:20, 19 February 2006‎ >Locke Cole‎ 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - it's only complicated until editors see it in action and get a chance to learn it, via this sample infobox
• curprev 00:4300:43, 19 February 2006‎ >Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ rvt to less complex code

16 February 2006

• curprev 00:0700:07, 16 February 2006‎ >Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - compromise was dismissed by Trodel and Netoholic, reverting to original

15 February 2006

• curprev 23:5423:54, 15 February 2006‎ >Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ removing complex code, per agreement on talk by several contributors

14 February 2006

• curprev 00:3200:32, 14 February 2006‎ >Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - it is for me if it is for you
• curprev 00:2000:20, 14 February 2006‎ >Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ reverting this "at will" is not an option.

13 February 2006

• curprev 17:3717:37, 13 February 2006‎ >Locke Cole‎ 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - then it appears we don't have a compromise anymore; I'll be reverting this at will since you seem unwilling to compromise
• curprev 13:2113:21, 13 February 2006‎ >Trödel‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ The compromise is linked to on the talk page - wikipedians who can't find it on the talk page should not be using an advance technique like that

11 February 2006

• curprev 23:4423:44, 11 February 2006‎ >Locke Cole‎ 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - the compromise included linking to the advanced template from this template, but that was rejected
• curprev 23:3723:37, 11 February 2006‎ >Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −487‎ we had a compromise (create alternate advanced template), see talk
• curprev 00:0900:09, 11 February 2006‎ >Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - I looked at the talk page, I see nothing new; the only compromise there that was supported has been reverted by you and Trodel

10 February 2006

• curprev 22:1822:18, 10 February 2006‎ >Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −234‎ we had a compromise, see talk
• curprev 22:1722:17, 10 February 2006‎ >Netoholic‎ 1,329 bytes −253‎ we had a compromise, see talk
• curprev 21:1921:19, 10 February 2006‎ >Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +253‎ rvt - yes, it is very confusing WP:OWN
• curprev 08:3308:33, 10 February 2006‎ >Trödel‎ 1,329 bytes −253‎ this latest change is very confusing

6 February 2006

• curprev 03:0803:08, 6 February 2006‎ >Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +487‎ rvt - have it your way, I'm not compromising anymore
• curprev 03:0703:07, 6 February 2006‎ >Netoholic‎ 1,095 bytes −134‎ Category is good enough. put "see also" on talk, if needed
• curprev 03:0203:02, 6 February 2006‎ >Locke Cole‎ 1,229 bytes +97‎ rvt - sigh
• curprev 02:5902:59, 6 February 2006‎ >Trödel‎ 1,132 bytes −97‎ including a link here is no better than explaining it here - it still encourages new users to use conditionals - when they should be discouraged from using them

5 February 2006

• curprev 10:5410:54, 5 February 2006‎ >Marknew‎ 1,229 bytes +97‎ Added link to Template:Infobox Conditionals

4 February 2006

• curprev 03:2603:26, 4 February 2006‎ >WGFinley‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ rv - and still no consensus to do it
• curprev 01:3901:39, 4 February 2006‎ >Crotalus horridus‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ Revert - see Template talk:Infobox for a lengthy justification.
• curprev 01:2101:21, 4 February 2006‎ >WGFinley‎ m 1,132 bytes −450‎ rv
• curprev 01:1601:16, 4 February 2006‎ >Crotalus horridus‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ um... what guidelines for meta-template usage? WP:AUM is simply an essay at this point. And for hiding empty rows, {{qif}} is the best we currently have.

3 February 2006

• curprev 15:0915:09, 3 February 2006‎ >WGFinley‎ m 1,132 bytes −450‎ rv - this revision fails all guidelines for meta-template usage
• curprev 01:3301:33, 3 February 2006‎ >Crotalus horridus‎ 1,582 bytes +450‎ Reversion to revision 37961367 using popups
• curprev 00:3700:37, 3 February 2006‎ >Netoholic‎ 1,132 bytes −450‎ rvt, this is Infobox 101
• curprev 00:3600:36, 3 February 2006‎ >Locke Cole‎ m 1,582 bytes +450‎ rvt again, per talk; please pretend you two respect consensus